Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertações PÓS-GRADUAÇÃO SCTRICTO SENSU Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Atenção à Saúde
Use este identificador para citar ou linkar para este item: http://bdtd.uftm.edu.br/handle/tede/212
Registro completo de metadados
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.creatorMELO, Adriana Feliciana-
dc.creator.ID03587427658por
dc.creator.Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0664634434435194por
dc.contributor.advisor1BARICHELLO, Elizabeth-
dc.contributor.advisor1ID63559935172por
dc.contributor.advisor1Latteshttp://lattes.cnpq.br/3078376864867526por
dc.date.accessioned2016-03-16T13:46:28Z-
dc.date.issued2015-05-20-
dc.identifier.citationMELO, Adriana Feliciana. Elaboração e validação de um instrumento de registro de feridas crônicas. 2015. 158f. Dissertação (Mestrado em Atenção à Saúde) - Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Atenção à Saúde, Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro, Uberaba, 2015.por
dc.identifier.urihttp://bdtd.uftm.edu.br/handle/tede/212-
dc.description.resumoFeridas crônicas são complexas e envolvem uma avaliação individualizada. Para acompanhar o processo evolutivo destas feridas, os registros devem ser sistematizados, permitir uma visualização global, identificar riscos e maximizar a comunicação. Os objetivos deste estudo foram elaborar um instrumento de avaliação e evolução de feridas crônicas e verificar suas propriedades métricas. Trata-se de uma pesquisa metodológica, desenvolvida em três etapas: etapa I, elaboração do instrumento, denominado neste estudo, de instrumento de registro de feridas crônicas; etapa II, caracterizada pela validação aparente e de conteúdo; e etapa III, verificar a validade e confiabilidade do instrumento. Nesta fase, foi utilizada como estratégia a confiabilidade interavaliadores. Para testar a confiabilidade dos itens do instrumento, foram utilizados Kappa simples e ponderado dos escores gerais obtidos em relação às observações das pesquisadoras, o Coeficiente de Correlação Intraclasse (ICC), que foi de 0,914, e para verificar a validade de critério do instrumento, o coeficiente de correlação de Pearson, cujo resultado foi de 0,573. O instrumento foi aplicado em 71 pacientes com feridas crônicas, no período de outubro de 2014 a janeiro de 2015, nas unidades de internação de clínica médica e cirúrgica e no Ambulatório do Hospital de Clínicas da Universidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiro. Da amostra, 56,3% eram mulheres, 72% idosos, e 60,6% apresentavam doenças cardiovasculares. Quanto à etiologia das feridas avaliadas, a de maior porcentagem foram as úlceras por pressão, com 45,1%. A maior parte das concordâncias dos itens do instrumento foi classificada como moderada e substancial, sendo encontrado nos itens que descreviam o tipo de tecido necrótico (k = 0,754), tipo de exsudato (k = 0,630), e nos subitens dor (k = 0,683), odor (k = 0,800), edema (k = 0,613). Os resultados apontam que o instrumento deste estudo é válido e confiável. Sugere-se que o instrumento seja aplicado em estudos longitudinais e em populações maiores, com distribuição igual de úlceras de diferentes etiologias crônicas, a fim de contribuir para a melhoria da qualidade da assistência, com respaldo de documentação adequada, permitindo orientação para o tratamento e a continuidade do cuidado.por
dc.description.abstractChronic wounds are complex and involve an individualized assessment. To follow the evolution process of these wounds, the records should be systematized, providing a global view, identify risks and maximize communication. The objectives of this study were to develop an assessment tool and evolution of chronic wounds and verify its psychometric properties. It is a methodological research, developed in three stages: stage I, development of the instrument, called chronic wounds recording instrument; stage II, characterized by apparent and content validation; and stage III, to verify the validity and reliability of the instrument. At this stage, we used a strategy of inter-rater reliability. To test the reliability of the instrument the items were used simple weighted Kappa and the general scores on the observations of the researchers, the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC), which was 0.914, and to check the validity of the instrument discretion, the correlation coefficient of Pearson, with result of 0.573. The instrument was administered to 71 patients with chronic wounds, from October 2014 to January 2015, in inpatient units of internal medicine and surgery at the Clinic and the Clinical Hospital of the Federal University of Triângulo Mineiro. In the sample, 56.3% were women, 72% elderly, and 60.6% had cardiovascular disease. In the etiology of wounds evaluated the highest percentage were pressure ulcers, with 45.1%. Most of the agreements of the instrument items was classified as moderate and substantial, being found in items that described the necrotic tissue type (k = 0.754), type of exudate (k = 0.630), and pain in subparagraphs (k = 0.683 ), odor (k = 0.800), edema (k = 0.613). The results show that the instrument of this study is valid and reliable. The instrument is suggested that applied in longitudinal studies and in larger populations, with equal distribution of different etiologies chronic ulcers, in order to contribute to improving the quality of care, with proper documentation support, allowing orientation for the treatment and continuity of care.eng
dc.formatapplication/pdf*
dc.thumbnail.urlhttp://bdtd.uftm.edu.br/retrieve/850/Dissert%20Adriana%20F%20Melo.pdf.jpg*
dc.languageporpor
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal do Triângulo Mineiropor
dc.publisher.departmentInstituto de Ciências da Saúde - ICS::Curso de Graduação em Enfermagempor
dc.publisher.countryBrasilpor
dc.publisher.initialsUFTMpor
dc.publisher.programPrograma de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Atenção à Saúdepor
dc.relation.referencesABBADE, L.P; LASTORIA, S. Venous ulcer: epidemiology, physiopathology, diagnosis and treatment. Int J Dermatol, Philadelphia, v. 44, n. 6, p. 449–56, 2005. ADDERLEY, U.J. Managing wound exudate and promoting healing. Br. J. Community Nurs., London, v.15, n.3, S15- 20, 2010. AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE VIGILÂNGIA SANITÁRIA. Assistência segura: uma reflexão teórica aplicada à prática. 1ª ed. Brasília: 2013, 172p. Disponível em: < www20.anvisa.gov.br/segurançadopaciente/imagens >. Acesso em 14 de abril de 2014. AHMED, T; HABOUBI, N. Assessment and management of nutrition in older people and its importance to health. Clin. Interv. Aging. Auckland, v.5, p. 207-16, 2010. ALAVI, A. et al. Diabetic foot ulcers part II: Management. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., St. Louis, v.70, n. 1, e1-e24, 2014. ARMOUR-BURTON, T. et al. The healthy skin project: changing nursing practice to prevent and treat hospital-acquired pressure ulcers. Crit. Care Nurse, Secaucus, v. 33, n.3, p.32-40, 2013. AUGUSTIN, M. et al. Quality of care in chronic leg ulcer in the community: introduction of quality indicators and a scoring system. Dermatology, Basel, v. 222, n. 4, p. 321-9, 2011. BAKKER, K; APELQVIST, J; SCHAPER, N.C. Practical guidelines on the management and prevention of the diabetic foot 2011. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev., v. 28, Supp 1, p. 225–231, 2012. BAJAY, H.M.; ARAÚJO, I.E.M. Validação e Confiabilidade de um Instrumento de Avaliação de Feridas. Acta Paul. Enferm., São Paulo, v. 19, n. 3, p. 290-5, 2006. BATES-JENSEN, B.M. The pressure sore status tool a few thousand assessments later. Adv. Wound Care, Atlanta, v. 10, n. 5, p. 65-73, 1997. BATES-JENSEN, B.M; VREDEVOE, D.L; BRECHT, M.L. Validity and reliabitity of the Pressure Sore Status Tool. Decubitus., Chicago, v. 5, n. 6, p. 20-8, 1992. BARRETT, M. et al. Challenges faced in implementation of a telehealth enabled chronic wound care system. Rural Remote Health, Geelong, v.9, n. 3, 1154 (Online), 2009. BENBOW, M. Wound care: ensuring a holistic and collaborative assessment. Br. j. Community Nurs. London, v. 16, n. 9, S6-S16, 2011. BENBOW, M. Ageing & wound healing. Br. J. Community Nurs, London, v. 24, n.5, p. 36- 42, 2010. BENBOW, M. Wound care: the basics. Pract. Nurse., Edmonton, v.37, n.6, p. 20-2, 2009. BENBOW, M; STEVENS, J. Exudate, infection and patient quality of life. Br J Community Nurs, London, v.19, n. 20, S30, S36, 2010. BLANES, J. I. et al. Consensus document on treatment of infections in diabetic foot. Rev. Esp. Quimioter., Barcelona, v. 24, n. 4, p.233-262, 2011. BLOEMEN, M.C. et al. Digital image analysis versus clinical assessment of wound epithelialization: a validation study. Burns., Guildford, v. 38, n. 4, p. 501-5, 2012. BLUESTEIN, D; JAVAHERI, A. Pressure Ulcers: prevention, evaluation, and management. Am. Fam. Physician., v. 78, n. 10, p.1186-94, 2008. BOLTON, L; GIROLAMI, S; HURLOW, J. The AAWC pressure ulcer guidelines. Am. J. Nurs., New York, v, 113, n. 9, p. 58 – 63, 2013. BORGES, E.L. et al. Feridas: como tratar, 2.ed. Belo Horizonte: Coopmed, 2008. BOSANQUET, N. Cost of venous ulcers: from maintenance therapy to investment programmes. Phlebol., London, v. 7, n. 1, p. 1, p.44–6, 1992. BRASIL, Ministério da Saúde. Parecer Técnico-Científico: Avaliação de Múltiplas Tecnologias em Feridas Crônicas e Queimaduras. Brasília. Disponível em: <http://formsus.datasus.gov.br/novoimgarq> . Acesso em: 01 de abril 2014. BRASIL, Ministério da Saúde. Secretaria de vigilância em saúde. Anais do Seminário Nacional de Vigilância em Doenças e agravos não transmissíveis e promoção da saúde. In: SILVA JÚNIOR, J.B. Seminário Nacional de Vigilância em Doenças e Agravos Não Transmissíveis e Promoção da Saúde. Brasília, p.11-12, 2006. Disponível em: < bvms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicações/anais_doenças_agravos.pdf.>. Acesso em: 20 de janeiro de 2015. BROLMANN, F.E. et al. Fundamentals of randomized clinical trials in wound care: reporting standards.Wound Repair Regen., Saint Louis, v. 21, n. 5, p. 641-7, 2013. BROUGHTON G; JANIS, J.E; ATTINGER, C.E. Wound healing: an overview. Plast. Reconstr. Surg., Baltimore, 2006, v. 117, S7, p.1-32, 2006. BROWN, A. Implications of patient shared decision-making on wound care. Br. J. Community Nurs., London, v. 18, Suppl: S26-8, S30-2, 2013. BULLOUGH, L; SPRUCE, P. Rememoving all barriers: a 10-patient evaluation in the acute care setting. Br. J. Nurs., London, v. 22, n. 20, S38-4, 2013. CANADATION ASSOCIATION WOUND CARE. Prevalence of Chronic Wounds in Canada: Gail Woodbury Pamela Hougton. Disponível em: < www.cawc.net/open/library/research/pandi/index.html>. Acesso em 17 de fev., de 2015. CASEY, G. Chronic wound healing: Leg ulcers. Nurs. N. Z., Wellington, v. 17, n. 11, p. 24- 9, 2011. CASTRO, A. A. Curso de revisão sistemática e metanálise. São Paulo: LEDDIS/ UNIFESP, 2006. Disponível em: <http://www.virtual.epm.br/cursos/metanalise> Acesso em: 21 Dez., 2014. CENTER FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION. National Diabetes Statistics Reports, 2014. Department of Health and Human Services, CfDCaPCenters for Disease Control and Prevention; Atlanta, GA: 2014. Disponível em: http://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/data/2014 Acesso em: 01 de Jun., 2015. CLARÁ, F.L.A. et al. Consensus document on treatment of infections in diabetic foot. Rev. esp. quimioter., Barcelona, v. 24, n. 4, p. 233-262, 2011. CLEGG, A. et al. North Carolina wound nurses examine heel pressure ulcers. J. Wound ostomy continence nurs., St. Louis, v. 36, n. 6, p. 635-9, 2009. CHIN, G.A; SCHULTZ, G; STACEY, M. Principles of wound bed preparation and their application to the treatment of chronic wounds. Primary Intention, v. 11, p. 171-174, 2004. COEHN, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2aed: Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum, 1988. 567p. COOK, L. Wound assessment: exploring competency and current practice. Br. j. community nurs, London, n. 16, v. 12, S34-S40, 2011. CORNFORTH, A. Holistic wound assessment in primary care. Br. j. community nurs., London, S28-34, 2013. DAVID, L.; STEED, M.D. Debridement. Am. J. Surg., New York, v. 187, p. 71–74, 2004. DEALEY, C. Cuidados de feridas: um guia prático para as enfermeiras. 2. ed. São Paulo: Atheneu; 2001. DENNIS, L.A. et al. Value of a modified clinical signs and symptoms of infection checklist for leg ulcer management. Br. J. Surg., Bristol, v. 97, p. 664–670, 2010. DEODHAR, A.K.; RANA, R.E. Surgical physiology of wound healing: a review. J. Postgrad. Med., Bombay, v. 43, n. 2, p. 52-6, 1997. DREW, P.; POSNETT, J.; RUSLING L.The cost of wound care for a local population in England. Int. Wound J., Oxford, v. 4, n. 2, p.149–55, 2007. DOWSETT, C. Use of TIME to improve community nurses’ wound care knowledge and practice. Wounds, UK, v. 5, n. 3, p. 1-8, 2009. DOWSETT, C; NEWTON, H. Wound bed preparation: TIME in practice. Wounds, UK. v.1, n.3, p. 58-70, 2005. DUNK, A.M; TAYLOR, J. Survey of clinicians’ perceptions of, and product choices for, the infected wound. Wound practice and Research, Canberra, v. 17, n. 1, p. 5-11, 2009. EMPARANZA, J.L. et al. A simple severity index for pressure ulcers. J. Wound Care., London, v. 9, n. 2, p. 86-90, 2000. EUROPEAN PRESSURE ULCER ADVISORY PANEL AND NATIONAL PRESSURE ULCER ADVISORY PANEL. Treatment of pressure ulcers: Quick Reference Guide. Washington DC: National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel; 2009. Disponível em <http://www.epuap.org/guidelines/Final_Quick_Treatment.pdf >. Acesso em 10 maio de 2014. FALANGA V. Classifications for wound bed preparation and stimulation of chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen., St. Louis, v. 8, p. 347–52, 2000. FALANGA, V. Wound bed preparation and the role of enzymes: a case for multiple actions of therapeutic agents. Wounds, King of Prussia, v. 14, n. 2, p. 47-57, 2002. FARIA, N. G. F; PERES, H. H. C. Análise da produção científica sobre documentações fotográficas de feridas em enfermagem. Rev. Eletr. Enf., Goiânia, v. 11, n. 3, p. 704-11, 2009. FARID, K.J. et al. Using temperature of pressure-related intact discolored areas of skin to detect deep tissue injury: an observational, retrospective, correlational study. Ostomy Wound Manage., King of Prussia PA, v. 58, n. 8, p. 20-31, 2012. FELDMAN, L.B; CUNHA, I.C. Identificação dos critérios de avaliação dos resultados do serviço de enfermagem nos programas de acreditação dos hospitais. Rev. Latinoam. Enferm, Ribeirão Preto, v. 14, n. 4, p. 540-5, 2006. FERNANDES, Luciana Magnani. Úlceras de Pressão em Pacientes Críticos Hospitalizados: uma Revisão Integrativa da Literatura. Ribeirão Preto – SP, 2000. 168 f. Dissertação (mestrado em enfermagem) – Universidade Estadual de Ribeirão Preto, Programa de pós Graduação em Enfermagem, Ribeirão Preto (SP), 2000. FERREL, B.; ARTINIAN, B.; SESSING, D. The Sessing Scale for assessment of pressure ulcer healing. J. Am. Geriatr. Society., New York, v. 1, n. 43, p.37-40, 1995. FERREL, B.A. et al. Cost-effectiveness of low-air-loss beds for treatment of pressure ulcers. J. Gerontol. A. Biolo. Sci. Med. Sci., Washington, v. 50, n. 3, p.141-6, 1995. FERREIRA A M; CANDIDO M C F S; CANDIDO M A. O cuidado de pacientes com feridas e a construção da autonomia do enfermeiro. Rev. enferm. UERJ., Rio de Janeiro, v. 18 n. 4, p. 656-60, 2010. FERREIRA, M.C. et al. Wounds complex. Clinics, São Paulo, v. 61, n. 6, p. 571-8, 2006. FIERHELLER, M; SIBBALD, R.G. A clinical investigation into the relationship between increased periwound skin temperature and local wound infection in patients with chronic leg ulcers. Adv. Skin Wound Care., Springhouse, v. 23, n. 8, p. 369-79, 2010. FIFE, C. et al. Limitations of daily living activities in patients with venous stasis ulcers undergoing compression bandaging: problems with the concept of self-bandaging. Wounds, King of Prussia, v. 19, n. 10, p.255–57, 2007. FLANAGAN M. Wound measurement: can it help us to monitor progression to healing? J. Wound Care., London, v. 12, p.189–94, 2003. FLANAGAN, M. A practical framework for wound assessment 2: methods. Br. J. Nurs., London, v. 6, p.6–11, 1997. FLEISS, J. L. The Design and Análysis of Clinical Experiments. Wiley, New York, 1986. FLETCHER, J. How can I accurately measure a wound and how often should I do it? Nurs. Times., London, v. 107, n. 4, p.15, 2011. FLORCZAK, B. et al. An observational study to assess an electronic point-of-care wound documentation and reporting system regarding user satisfaction and potential for improved care. Ostomy Wound Manage, King of Prussia PA, v. 58, n.3, p.46-51, 2012. FRIEDBERG, E; HARRISON, M.B.,GRAHAM, I.D. Current home care expenditures for persons with leg ulcers, J. Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs, St Louis, v. 29: n. 4, p. 186– 192, 2002. FRYKBERG, R.G., et al. Diabetic foot disorders: a clinical practice guideline. J. Foot Ankle Surg., Baltimore, v. 45, n.5, S1-S66, 2006. GARCIA, A.D.; THOMAS, D.R. Assessment and management of chronic pressure ulcers in the elderly. Med. Clin. North Am., Philadelphia, v. 90, n. 5, p.925-944, 2006. GARDNER, S.E.; HILLIS, S.L.; FRANTZ, R.A. A prospective study of the PUSH toll in diabetic foot ulcer. J. Wound Ostomy Continece Nurs., St Louis, v. 38, n.4, p.385-393, 2011. GARDNER, S.E; FRANTZ, R.A; DOEBBELING, B.N. The validity of the clinical signs and symptoms used to identify localized chronic wound infection. Wound Repair Regen., St Louis, v. 9, n. 3, p. 178-86, 2001. GEORGE-SAINTILUS, E. et al . Pressure Ulcer PUSH score and traditional nursing assessment in nursing home residents: do they correlate? J. Am. Med. Dir. Assoc., Hagerstown, v. 10, n.2, p. 141–144, 2009. GERO, L; ASTRID, F. Nutritional interventions for preventing and treatting pressure ulcer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev., Oxford, n. 4, CD 003216, 2003. GOHEL, M.S.; POSKITT, K.R. Chronic ulceration of the leg. Surgery, St Louis, v. 31, n.5, p. 224-228, 2013. GRANICK, M.S, LADIN, D.A. The multidisciplinary in-hospital wound care team: two models. Adv. Wound Care, Atlanta, v.11, p. 80–83, 1998. GONZÁLEZ-CONSUEGRA, R.V; VERDU J. Quality of life in people with venous leg ulcers: an integrative review. J. Adv Nurs., Oxford, v. 67, n. 5, p. 926–944, 2011. GORDON, M.D. et al. Review of evidence-based practice for the prevention of pressure sores in burn patients. J. Burn Care Rehabil., St Louis, n.5 p. 388–410, 2004. GROCOTT, P; CAMPLING, N. A methodology for evaluating wound care products in complex chronic wounds. Wounds, Uk, v. 5, n. 4, p.28-34, 2009. GROTHIER, L; PARDOE, A. Chronic wounds: management of healing and wellbeing. Br. J. Nurs., London, v. 22, n. 12, S24, S26-30, 2013. GRUPO DE TRABALHO INTERNACIONAL SOBRE PÉ DIAB. Consenso internacional sobre o pé diabético. 1. ed. Brasília: Secretaria de Estado de Saúde do Distrito Federal, 2001. GUY, H. Accountability and legal issues in tissue viability nursing. Nurs. Stand., London, v. 25, n. 7, p. 62-67, 2010. HAGHPANAH, S. et al. Reliability of electronic versus manual wound measurement techniques. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., Chicago, v. 87, n. 10, p. 1396–402, 2006. HAMMOND, C.E; NIXON, M.A. The reliability of a handheld wound measurement and documentation device in clinical practice. J. Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs., St Louis, v. 38, n. 3, p. 260-4, 2011. HAMPTON, S. Pressure care, part three: managing and treating wounds. Nursing and Residential Care, London, v. 11, n. 2, p. 65-68, 2009. HARRIS, C. et al. Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool Pictorial Guide Validation Project. J. Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs.,St Louis, v. 37, n. 3, p. 253-259, 2010. HESS, C.T.; KIRSNER, R.S. Uncover the latest techiques in wound bed preparation. Specific strategies, innovative products advance the healing process. Nurs. Manage., Chicago, v. 34, n. 12, p. 54-56, 2003. HINDLEY, J. Traffic light system for healed venous leg ulcer monitoring. Br. J. Community Nurs., London, S6-S10, 2012. HOUGHTON, P.E. et al. Electrical stimulation therapy increases healing of pressure ulcers in community dwelling people with spinal cord injury. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil., Chicago, v. 91, n. 5, p. 669-78, 2010. HOUGHTON, P.E. et al. Effect of electrical stimulation on chronic leg ulcer size and appearance. Phys. Ther., New York, v. 83, p. 17-28, 2003. HOUGHTON,P.E. et al. Photographic assessment of the appearance of chronic pressure and leg ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage., King of Prussia PA, v. 46, n. 4, p. 20-30, 2000. 132 HON, J. et al. A prospective, multicenter study to validate use of the PUSH in patients with diabetic, venous, and pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage., King of Prussia PA, v. 56, n. 2, p. 26-36, 2010. HOUSE, S; GILES, T; WHITCOMB, J. Benchmarking to the international pressure ulcer prevalence survey. J. Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs., St Louis, v. 38, n. 3, p. 254-9, 2011. JAKSA, P.J, MAHONEY, J.L. Quality of life in patients with diabetic foot ulcers: validation of the Cardiff Wound Impact Schedule in a Canadian population. Int. Wound J., Oxford, v. 7, n. 6, p. 502-7, 2010. JAUL, E. Assessment and management of pressure ulcers in the elderly. Drugs Aging., Auckland, v. 27, n. 4, p. 311-325, 2010. JESADA, E.S. et al. Staging and defining characteristics of pressure ulcers using photographs by staff nurses in acute care setting. J. Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs. , St Louis, v. 40, n. 2, p. 150-156, 2013. JONES, K.R. Why do chronic venous leg ulcers not heal? J. Nurs. Care Qual., Frederick v. 24, n. 2, p. 116-24, 2009. JONES, J; BARRAUD, J. An evaluation of KerraMax Care in the management of moderate to heavily exuding wounds. Br. J. Community Nurs., London, Suppl:S48-S53, 2014. JORGE, A.S; DANTAS S.R.P.E. Feridas e estomas. 1. ed. Campinas, SP: Edição do autor, 2005. 110p. JORGE, A.S.; DANTAS, S.R.P.E. Abordagem multiprofissional do tratamento de feridas/Histologia da pele normal. São Paulo: Editora Atheneu, 2003. 378p. KALTENTHALER E. et al. UK, USA and Canada: how do their pressure ulcer prevalence and incidence data compare? J. Wound Care., London, v. 10, n. 1, p. 530-535, 2001. KEAST, D.H. et al. MEASURE: A proposed assessment framework for developing best practice recommendations for wound assessment. Wound Repair. regen.,St Louis, v. 12 (3 Suppl) p. 1-17, 2004. KINNUNEN, U.M. et al. Developing the standardized wound care documentation model: a Delphi study to improve the quality of patient care documentation. J. Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs., St Louis, v. 39, n. 4, p. 397-407, 2012. KRASNER, D.L.Caring for wounds. Long-Term Living: For the Continuing Care Professional, v. 59, n. 8, p. 38-38, 1p.2, 2010. KRASNER, D. Wound Healing Scale, Version 1.0: a Proposal. Adv. Wound Care., Atlanta, v. 10, n. 5, p. 82-5, 1997. KUJATH, P.; MICHELSEN, A. Wounds. from physiology to wound dressing: wunden von der physiologie zum verband. Dtsch Arztebl., v.105, n. 13, p. 239–48, 2008. LANDIS, J.R; KOCH, G.G. The measurement of observer agrément for categorical data. Biometrics., Washington, v. 33, p.159-74, 1997. LAWRENCE, W.T.; DIEGELMANN, R.F. Growth factors in wound healing. Clin. Dermatol., Philadelphia, v. 12, p. 157-169, 1994. LI, D; KORNIEWICZ, D. M. Determination of the effectiveness of electronic health records to document pressure ulcers. Medsurg Nurs., Pitman, v. 22 , n. 1, p. 17-25, 2013. LIMA, A.C.B.; GUERRA, D.M. Avaliação dos custos do tratamento por úlceras por pressão em pacientes hospitalizados usando curativos industrializados. Ciênc. Saúde Coletiva., Rio de Janeiro, v. 16, n. 1, p. 267-277, 2011. LINDSEY, D.L. Instrument Review: getting the most from a panel of experts. Appl. Nurs. Res., Philadelphia, v. 5, n. 4, p. 194-197, 1992. LIZAKA, S. et al. Predictive validity of granulation tissue color measured by digital image analysis for deep pressure ulcer healing: a multicenter prospective cohort study. Wound Repair Regen., St Louis, v. 21, n. 1, p. 25-34, 2013. LIZAKA, S. et al. Concurrent validation and reliability of digital image analysis of granulation tissue color for clinical pressure ulcers. Wound Repair. Regen., St Louis, v. 19, n. 4, p. 455-63, 2011. LIZAKA, S. et al. Do nutritional markers in wound fluid reflect pressure ulcer status? Wound Repair. Regen., St Louis, v. 18, n. 1, p. 31-7, 2010. LYNN, M.R. Determination and quantification of contente validity. Nurs. Res., New York, v. 35, n. 6, p. 382-385, 1986. MACHADO, J. F; OLIVEIRA, B. G. R. B; BOKEHI, J. R. Technological production of a prototype of the electronic record system CICATRIZAR: an applied study. Online Braz. J. Nurs., Niterói, Suppl: 764-66, 2013. MACIEL, Érica Augusta Faria. Prevalência de feridas em pacientes internados em um hospital filantrópico de grande porte de Belo Horizonte. Belo Horizonte – MG, 2008. 92 f. Dissertação (mestrado em enfermagem) – Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Programa de pós graduação em Enfermagem, Belo Horizonte (MG), 2008. MAIDA, V.; ENNIS, M.; KUZIEMSKY, C. The Toronto Symptom Assessment System for wounds: a new clinical and research tool. Adv. Skin Wound Care., Springhouse, v. 22, n. 10, p. 468-74, 2009. MAJESKE, C. Reliability of wound surface area measurements. Phys. Ther., New York, v. 72, n. 2, p. 138–41, 1992. MANDELBAUM, S.H.; SANTIS, E.P.D.; MANDELBAUM, M.H.S. Cicatrização: conceitos atuais e recursos auxiliares. An. Bras. Dermatol., Rio de Janeiro, v. 78, n. 4, p. 393-410, 2003. MCKEENEY, L. Evaluating the effectiveness of wound management products. Nurs. Stand., London, v. 26, n. 7, p. 72-76, 2011. MARTÍNEZ-DE JESÚS, F.R. A checklist system to score healing progress of diabetic foot ulcers. Int. J. Low. Extrem. Wounds., Thousand Oaks, v. 9, n. 2, p. 74-83, 2010. MARTINS, M. A. et al. Úlcera crônica de perna de pacientes em tratamento ambulatorial: análise microbiológica e de tratamento ambulatorial: análise microbiológica de suscetibilidade antimicrobiana. Cienc. Cuid. Saude., Maringá, v. 9, n. 3, p. 464-470, 2010. MATSUDA LM. et al. Anotações/registros de enfermagem: instrumento de comunicação para a qualidade do cuidado? Rev. Eletrônica Enferm., Goiânia, v. 8, n. 3, p. 415-21, 2006. MATSUI Y. et al. Development of the DESIGN-R with an observational study: an absolute evaluation tool for monitoring pressure ulcer wound healing. Wound Repair. Regen., St Louis, v. 19, n. 3, p. 309-15, 2011. MEDEIROS, A.B.F; LOPES C.H.A.F; JORGE, M.S.B. Análise da prevenção e tratamento das úlceras por pressão propostos por enfermeiros. Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP., São Paulo, v. 43, n. 1, p. 223-8, 2009. MENDES, K. D. S.; SILVEIRA, R. C. C. P.; GALVÃO, C. M. Revisão integrativa: método de pesquisa para a incorporação de evidências na saúde e na enfermagem. Texto Contexto Enfermagem, Florianópolis, v. 17, n. 4, p. 758-764, 2008. MENON, J. Managing exudate associated with venous leg ulceration. Br. J. Community Nurs., London, Suppl:S6-S10, 2012. MILMAN, M.H.S.A et al. Pé diabético: avaliação da evolução e custo hospitalar de pacientes internados no conjunto hospitalar de Sorocaba. Arq. Bras. Endocrinol. Metab., São Paulo, v. 45, n. 5, p. 447-51, 2001. NAKAGAMI, G. et al. Predicting delayed pressure ulcer healing using thermography: a prospective cohort study. J. Wound Care.,London, v. 19, n. 11, p. 465-470, 2010. NEILL, K; TURNBULL, K. Use of specialist knowledge and experience to manage patients with mixed aetiology leg ulcers. J. Wound Care. , London, v. 21, n. 4, p. 168-174, 2012. NOKES, K.M. et al. Teaching home care electronic documentation skills to undergraduate nursing students. Nurs. Educ. Perspect. New York, v. 33, n. 2, p. 111-5, 2012. NONINHO, R.A.P.M; ANSELMI, M.L; DALMAS, J.C. Avaliação da qualidade do procedimento curativo em pacientes internados em um hospital universitário. Rev. Latinoam. Enferm., Ribeirão Preto, v. 16, n. 1, p. 1-8, 2008. O BRIEN, J.A; COWMAN, S. An exploration of nursing documentation of pressure ulcer care in an acute setting in Ireland. J. Wound Care., London, v. 20, n. 5, p.197-203, 2011. O’MEARA, S.; CULLUM, N.; NELSON, E. Compression for venous leg ulcers. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., v. 21, n. 1, CD 000265, 2009. ORSTED, H.L; WOODBURY, M.G; STEVENSON K. The Wound CARE Instrument. the process for developing standards for wound management education and programming. Int. Wound J., Oxford, v. 9, p. 264–270, 2012. OUSEY, K; COOK, L. Understanding the importance of holistic wound assessment. Practice Nursing, Huddersfield, v. 22, n. 6, p. 308-314, 2011. OUSEY, K. MCINTOSH. Understanding wound bed preparation and wound debridement. Br. J. Community Nurs., London, v. 15, n. 3, S22-S26, 2010. ORGANIZAÇÃO NACIONAL DE ACREDITAÇÃO. Manual de acreditação das organizações prestadoras de serviços hospitalares, Anvisa, Brasília, 2006. Disponível em: < ttp:www.anvisa.gov.br/servicosaude/acreditacao/ manuais/pdf >. Acesso em: 5 de março de 2014. PÁLSDÓTTIR, G; THORODDSEN, A. Chronic leg ulcers among the Icelandic population EWMA Journal, Frederiksberg, v. 10, n.1 p. 19-23, 2010. PAPAZOGLOU, E.S. et al. Image analysis of chronic wounds for determining the surface area. Wound Repair. Regen., St Louis, v. 18, n. 4, p. 349-58, 2010. PASQUALI, L. Princípios de elaboração de escalas psicológicas. Rev. Psiquiatr. Clín., Santiago, v. 25, n. 5, p.206-13, 1998. PINA, E.; FURTADO, K.; ALBINO, A.P. Boas práticas no tratamento e prevenção das úlceras de perna de origem venosa. 1. ed. Pampilhosa da Serra: GAIF; 2007. PHILLIPS, T.J.; DOVER, J.S. Leg ulcers. J. Am. Acad. Dermatol., St Louis, v. 25, 6 Pt 1, p. 965-87, 1991. PODMORE, J. Leg ulcers: weighing up the evidence. Nurs. Stand., London, v. 8, n. 38, p. 25–7, 1994. POLIT, D.F.; BECK, C.T. Fundamentos de pesquisa de enfermagem: avaliação de evidências para a prática de enfermagem. 7.ed. Porto Alegre: Artmed, 2011.669p. RATLIFF, C.R.; RODEHEAVER, G.T. Use of the PUSH tool to measure venous ulcer healing. Ostomy wound manage., King of Prussia PA, v. 51, n. 5, p. 58-60, 2005. REDDY, M. Pressure ulcers. BMJ Clin. Evid., London,pii.1901, p.1-43, 2011. REDDY, M; GILL, S.S; ROCHON, P.A. Preventing pressure ulcers: a systematic review. Jama, Chicago, v. 296, n.8, p. 974–84, 2006. REGMI, S; REGMI K. Best practice in the management of venous leg ulcers. Nurs. Stand., London, v. 6, n. 32, p. 56-60, 2012. REYNOLDS, V. Using the prescribing pyramid in managing wound infections: part 2. Nurse Prescribing, London, v. 11, n. 6, p. 284-290, 2013. RESTREPO- MEDRANO, J.C.; SORIANO, J.V. Development of a wound healing index for chronic wounds. EWMA Jornal, Frederiksberg, v. 12, n. 2, p. 35-42, 2012. RESTREPO-MEDANO, J.C; VERDÚ, J. Medida de la cicatrización en úlceras por presión. Con qué contamos? Gerokomos, Madrid, v. 22, n. 1, p. 35-42, 2011. RIJSWIJK, L.V. Wound Wise. Measuring wounds to improve outcomes. Am. J. Nurs., New York, v. 113, n. 8, p. 60-61, 2013. ROBSON, M.C. Wound infection. A failure of wound healing caused by an imbalance of bacteria. Surg. Clin. North America., Philadelphia, v. 77, n.3, p. 637-650, 1997. ROBSON, M.C.; COOPER, D.M.; ASLAM, R.; GOULD, L.J. Guidelines for the prevention of venous ulcers. Wound Repair. Regen., St Louis, v. 16, p. 147–150, 2008. ROGERS, L.C. et al.. Digital planimetry results in more accurate wound measurements: a comparison to standard ruler measurements. J. Diabetes Sci. Technol., v. 4, n.4, p. 799-802. ROTHER, E. T. Revisão sistemática x revisão narrativa. Acta Paul. Enferm., São Paulo, v. 20, n. 2, p. v-vi , 2007. RUBIO, DM. et al. Objectifying contente validity: Conducting a contente validity study in social work research. Soc. Work. Res., Washington, v. 27, n. 2, p. 94-105, 2003. SALMOND, S.W. Orthopaedic nursing research priorities: a Delphi study. J. Orthop. Nurs., Edinburgh, v. 13, n. 2, p. 31-45, 1994. SAMPAIO, S.A.P. Dermatologia básica. Por Sebastião A. P. Sampaio, Raymundo M. Castro e Evandro A. Rivitti. 2.ed. São Paulo: Artes Médicas, 1978. 645p. SAMPAIO SANTOS, F.A, DE MELO, R.P; LOPES, M.V. Characterization of health status with regard to tissue integrity and tissue perfusion in patients with venous ulcers according to the nursing outcomes classification. J. Vasc. Nurs., Norwood, v. 28, n. 1, p. 14-20, 2010. SANADA, H. et al.Clinical wound assessment using DESIGN-R total score can predict pressure ulcer healing: Pooled analysis from two multicenter cohort studies. Wound Repair. Regen., v. 19, n. 5, p. 559–567, 2011. SANADA, H. et al. Evaluating the effect of the new incentive system for high-risk pressure ulcer patients on wound healing and cost-effectiveness: a cohort study. Int. J. Nurs. Stud., Oxford, v. 47, n. 3, p. 279-286, 2010. SANADA, H. et al Reliability and validity of DESIGN, a tool that classifies pressure ulcer severity and monitors healing. J. Wound Care., London, v. 13, n. 1, p. 13-8, 2004. SANTAMARIA, N; OGCE, F; GORELIK. A Healing rate calculation in the diabetic foot ulcer: comparing different methods.Wound Repair. Regen., St Louis, v. 20, n. 5, p. 786-9, 2012. SANTOS, V.L.C.G. et al. Adaptação transcultural do Pressure Ulcer Scale For Healing (PUSH) para a língua portuguesa. Rev. Latinoam. Enferm., Ribeirão Preto, v. 13, n. 3, p. 305-13, 2005. SANTOS, V.L.C.G; SELLMER, D; MASSULO, M.M.E.Confiabilidade interobservadores do pressure ulcer scale for healing (PUSH), em pacientes com úlceras crônicas de perna. Rev Latinoam Enferm., v. 15, n. 3, 2007. SCHNEIDER, A; BHATIA, A. Nine steps to making your office a wound care center of excellence. Podiatry Management, Pennsylvania, v. 29, n. 6, p. 115-120, 2010. SCHILLING, J. Wound heling. Surg. Clin. North Am., Philadelphia, v. 56, n. 4, p. 859-74, 1976. SCHULTZ, G.S. et al. The Wound Bed Advisory Board MembersWound bed preparation and a brief history of TIME. Int. Wound J., Oxford, vol. 1, n. 1, p. 19-32, 2004. SCHULTZ, G.S. et al. Wound bed preparation: a systematic approach to wound management. Wound Repair. Regen., St Louis, S1–28, 2003. SCHUREN, J; VOS, A; ALLEN, J.O. Venous leg ulcer patients with low ABPIs: how much pressure is safe and tolerable? EWMA Journal, Frederiksberg,v. 10, n. 3, p. 29-33, 2010. SEN, C.K; GORDILLO, G.M; ROY, S, et al. Human skin wounds: a major and snowballing threat to public health and the economy. Wound Repair Regen., St Louis, v. 17, n. 6, p. 763– 771, 2009. SERENA, T. et al. Consensus principles for wound care research obtained using a Delphi process. Wound Repair. Regen. St Louis, v. 20, n. 3, p. 284-93, 2012. SHARPER, N.C. et al. Specific guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of peripheral arterial disease in a patient with diabetes and ulceration of the foot 2011. Diabetes Metab. Res. Rev., n. 28(Suppl 1), p. 236–237, 2012. SHEARER, A et al. Predicted costs and outcomes from reduced vibration detection in people with diabetes in the U.S. Diabetes Care, New York, v. 26, n. 8, p. 2305–10, 2003. SINGH, N; ARMSTRONG, D.G, LIPSKY, B.A. Preventing foot ulcers in patients with diabetes. Jama, Chicago, v. 293, n. 2, p. 217–28, 2005. SIBBALD, R.G. et al. Preparing the wound bed debridement, bacterial balance and moisture balance. Ostomy Wound Manage., King of Prussia PA, v. 46, n. 11, p. 14-35, quis 36-7, 2000. STEPHEN-HAYNES, J. et al. The assessment and management of skin tears in care homes Br. J. Nurs., London, v. 20, n. 11, S12-S22, 2011. STETLER, C. B. et al. Utilization-focused integrative reviews in a nursing servisse. Appl. Nurs. Res., Philadelphia, v.11, n.4, p.195-206, 1998. SILVA, R.C.L.; FIGUEIREDO, N.M.A.; MEIRELES, I.B. Feridas: fundamentos e atualizações em enfermagem. 2. ed. São Caetano do Sul: Yendis, 2007. 508p. SITTART, J.A.S. Dermatologia para o clinico. José Alexandre Sittart, Mário Cézar Pires. 2. ed. São Paulo: Lemos-Editorial, 1999. 437p. SOLOWIEJ, K; UPTON, D. Managing stress and pain to prevent patient discomfort, distress and delayed wound healing. Nurs. Times, London, v. 106, n. 16, p. 21-3, 2010. STECHMILLER, J.K. et al. Guidelines for the prevention of pressure ulcers. Wound Repair. Regen., St Louis, v. 16, n.2, p. 151–168, 2008. SUNG, Y.H; PARK, K.H. Factors affecting the healing of pressure ulcers in a Korean acute care hospital. J. Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs., St Louis, v. 38, n. 1, p. 38-45, 2011. SPEAR, M. Wound exudate--the good, the bad, and the ugly. Plast. Surg. Nurs., v. 32, n. 2, p. 77-9, 2012. SUSAN, T. Using significant event audit to improve safety in clinical practice. Pract. Nurse, Edmonton, v. 41, n. 20, p. 38, 2011. SUSSMAN, C.; SWANSON, G. Utility of the Sussman Wound Healing Tool in predicting wound healing outcomes in physical therapy. Adv. Wound Care., v. 10, n. 5, p. 74-7, 1997. TERRIS, D.D. et al. Comparison of in-person and digital photograph assessment of stage III and IV pressure ulcers among veterans with spinal cord injuries. J. Reahabil. Res. Dev.,Washington, v. 48, n. 3, p. 215-224, 2011. TERRY, M. et al. Feasibility study of home care wound management using telemedicine. Adv. Skin Wound Care., Springhouse, v. 22, n. 8, p. 358-64., 2009. THOMAS, D.R. et al. Pressure ulcer scale for healing: derivation and validation of the PUSH tool. The PUSH Task Force. Adv. Wound Care, Atlanta, v. 10, n. 5, p. 96-101, 1997. THOMPSON, N. et al. Reliability and Validity of the Revised Photographic Wound Assessment Tool on Digital Images Taken of Various Types of Chronic Wounds. Adv. in Skin Wound Care., Springhouse, v. 26, n. 8, p. 360-373., 2013. THORODDSEN, A. et al. Accuracy, completeness and comprehensiveness of information on pressure ulcers recorded in the patient record. Scan. J. Caring. Sci., Stockholm, v. 27, n. 1, p. 84–91, 2013. TIMMS, L. Effect of nutrition on wound healing in older people: a case study. Br. J. Nurs., London, v. 20, n. 11, S4-10, 2011. UBBINK, D.T. et al. Topical negative pressure for treating chronic wounds. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., Oxford, v. 16, n. 3, CDOO1898, 2008. UPTON, D; ANDREWS, A. Sleep disruption in patients with chronic leg ulcers. J. Wound Care., London, v. 22, n. 8, 389-394, 2013. URGUHART, C. et al. Nursing record systems: effects on nursing practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev., Oxford, v 21, n. 1,CD002099, 2009. VAN HECKE, A. et al. Systematic development and validation of a nursing intervention: the case of lifestyle adherence promotion in patients with leg ulcers. J. Adv. Nurs., Oxford, v. 67, n. 3, p. 662-76, 2011a. VAN HECKE, A. et al. Development and psychometric evaluation of an instrument to assess venous leg ulcer lifestyle knowledge among nurses. J. Adv. Nurs., Oxford, v. 67, n. 12, p. 2574-2585., 2011b. VAN POUCKE, S. et al. Comparative analysis of two methods for wound bed area measurement. Int. Wound J., Oxford, v. 7, n. 5, p. 366–377, 2010. VERHONICK, R. Decubitus ulcer observations measured objectively. Nurs. Res., New York, v. 10, 211-4, 1961. VITURI, D.W.; MATSUDA, L.M. Validação de conteúdo de indicadores da qualidade para avaliação do cuidado de enfermagem. Rev.Esc. Enferm. USP., São Paulo, v. 43, n. 2, p. 429- 37, 2009. WHITTEMORE, R.; KNAFL, K. The integrative review: updated methodology. Journal of Advanced Nursing, Oxford, v. 52, n. 5, p. 546-553, 2005. WHITTEMORE, R. Combining evidence in nursing research: methods and implications. Nursing Research, Baltimore, v. 54, n. 1, p. 56-62, 2005. WOODBURY, M.G. et al. Development, validity, reliability and responsiveness of a new leg ulcer measurement tool. Adv. Skin Wound Care., Springhouse, v. 17, p.187-96, 2004. WORLD HEALTH ASSOCIATION. Diabetes. The cost of diabetes. fact sheet: n. 236, 2002. Disponível em< http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs236/en/ >. Acesso: 20 de abril de 2014. WORLD UNION OF WOUND HEALING SOCIETEIE. Wound infection in clinical practice. A consensus document. London: MEP Ltd: WUWHS 2008, 10p. Disponível em < www.woundsinternational.com >. Acesso: 20 de Agosto de 2014. WORLD UNION OF WOUND HEALING SOCITEIES. Principios de las mejores prácticas: Exudado en las heridas y utilidad de los apósitos. Un documento de consenso. London: MEPLtd: WUWHS, 2007, 12p. Disponível em: < www.woundsinternational.com. > Acesso: 10 de Agosto de 2014. ZASLAVSKY C, GUS I. Idoso. Doença cardíaca e comorbidades. Arq. Bras. Cardiol., São Paulo, v. 79 n. 6, p. 635-9, 2002. ZHONG, X. et al. Reliability and validity of the chinese version of DESIGN-R, an assessment instrument for pressure ulcers. Ostomy Wound Manage., King of Prussia PA, v. 59, n.2, p. 36-43, 2013.por
dc.rightsAcesso Abertopor
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/-
dc.subjectEnfermagem.por
dc.subjectCicatrização de feridas.por
dc.subjectEstudos de validação.por
dc.subjectRegistros de enfermagem.por
dc.subjectNursing.eng
dc.subjectWound healing.eng
dc.subjectValidation studies.eng
dc.subjectNursing records.eng
dc.subject.cnpqEnfermagempor
dc.titleElaboração e validação de um instrumento de registro de feridas crônicaspor
dc.title.alternativeElaboration and validation of a chronic wound recording instrumenteng
dc.typeDissertaçãopor
Aparece nas coleções:Programa de Pós-Graduação Stricto Sensu em Atenção à Saúde

Arquivos associados a este item:
Arquivo Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Dissert Adriana F Melo.pdfDissert Adriana F Melo1,58 MBAdobe PDFThumbnail
Visualizar/Abrir
Mostrar registro simples do item Visualizar estatísticas


Este item está licenciada sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons